As you know,
Google announced their Hummingbird algorithm about a month after it launched,
claiming no one noticed and no one should notice. But we do think we did notice
but no one can confirm that outside of Google and they won't.
That being
said, clearly the search results are different since the launch of Hummingbird
and SEOs will likely need to adapt.
Some forward
thinking SEOs and webmasters are already thinking up what the end game for
Google is with Hummingbird and how to adapt their sites to fit that box.
A
WebmasterWorld thread has some really interesting conversation around what some
believe the key difference is before and after Hummingbird.
Unique Content versus Useful Content
While unique
content is more of a Google Panda related thing, useful content although Panda,
is maybe more Hummingbird.
Google
understands searchers queries differently with Hummingbird than they did
before. So how can the search results not change. How can you as a webmaster
change your content to make it more useful, while it still being unique, to
encourage Google to show your site over your competitors.
Don't
optimize for keywords, optimize for a satisfied customer from stage one of the
buying cycle to the end. Is it that easy? What if you don't offer all the
stages? Well, I assume that is not exactly the point.
Robert
believes this will eventually lead to search results that are "less a
collection of content farms and more a collection of pages created with the
user genuinely in mind." I am not 100% confident.
Keep in mind,
this is just one theory of many and for the most part, the search results did
not change that much compared to let's say Penguin 2.1.